Thus, we go on to discuss some of the most important results in contemporary prosopography, taking English research as our reference. The identification of these problems is not intended to negate prosopography's importance but to clarify the dangers inherent to its careless usage. We then comment on some of the major problems involved in acritical use of prosopography: the absence of adequate data, mistakes in data classification, errors in data interpretation and problems in the theoretical interpretation of data. some of the most important early works: Charles Beard and Lewis Namier's historiographic research and Robert Merton's work in Sociology. This is followed by a discussion of the precursors of the method and. In the first place, it supplies a historical review of the first real prosopographic efforts, distinguishing the elitist schools, of a more individualizing nature, from the sociological ones, which are more collectivist in their approach. This article provides a general presentation of the research methodology of prosopography. StraipsnioĪutorė nevengia kokybinio tyrimo būdo apologijos provokacinio stiliaus. Svarstomi įvairūs kokybinio metodo privalumai, įskaitant plačios apimties focus-grupių pavyzdžius.
Ir aplinkybės, rodančios, kad šis metodas Rumunijoje ir Centrinėje Rytų Europoje yra marginalizuojamas.
Aptariamos kokybinio metodo pasirinkimo priežastys Teorijų taikymo moksliniams tyrimams patikimumas. Viena vertus, svarbu kriterijų ir konstrukcijų pagrįstumas, kita vertus, sociologinių Straipsnis parengtas remiantis asmenišku autorės, dirbančios tyrimo metodologijų srityje, patyrimu.Īnalizuojami sociologinio mokslinio tyrimo trūkumai, susiję su dviem tyrimo pakopomis: teorine struktūra KODĖL AŠ PASIRINKAU KOKYBINIO TYRIMO BŪDĄ? Key words: sociological research methodology, qualitative research, quantitative research, validity. The article advocates for the usage of qualitative and it is written in a personal Is being analyzed (its use without following two of the major qualitative principals: theoretical samplingĪnd theoretical saturation). The special case of using the focus-group at a large scale
Through what methods, with what results). The advantages of qualitative research in socio-human sciences are presented (what is being researched, The constant disapproval of this method in Romanian sociology (and it’s marginalization in Central – EastĮurope). Reasons for which qualitative is chosen are listed despite
Utility in scientific research are under discussion. At the same time, the character of sociological theories and their Theoretical framework and operationalization this is the way in which the validity of the criteria and theĬonstruct validity came into discussion. Some limits of the social scientific research are being analyzed, regarding two of the stages of research: The present article presents the personal experience of the author with research methodologies.
0 kommentar(er)
